‘Cameraperson’ Explores Our Relationship With Humanity
NEW YORK—The opening shot is an unfocused patch of dirt. It’s not what you’d expect from a documentary titled “Cameraperson,” a documentary about documentaries and a visual memoir of cinematographer Kirsten Johnson’s 25-year film career.
“That’s not the way I imagined it!” said Johnson, who took the director’s seat this time, for “Cameraperson.”
“For a long time I struggled with—I was trying for a really long time to get this beautiful shot as the opening,” she said. “But that’s not what I’m trying to talk about [with the film].” She realized it was not about showing what beautiful camerawork she could do. That wouldn’t come close to communicating her experience as a cameraperson.
With “Cameraperson,” which opens on Sept. 9 in New York, Johnson wanted not just to document her career, but also to communicate her personal experience and the issues she juggled from behind the camera—ethics, humanity, power—to the audience.
“We wanted the audience to be as empowered as possible to think for themselves,” she said.
The documentary is a compilation of footage shot during the making of 24 films, plus additional original footage of her family. Included in Johnson’s camera credits are many documentaries that dealt with the big questions in society. “Election Day” (2007) showed the on-the-street experience of American voters; “Darfur Now” (2007) examined the genocide in western Sudan; “No Woman, No Cry” (2010) told the personal stories behind the statistics of the 500,000 deaths each year caused by inadequate health care obtained during pregnancy; “Citizenfour” (2014) captured the first meetings with whistleblower Edward Snowden; and “Risk” (2016) tells the story of WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange.
Yet, documentaries are not organic. Everyone on the scene influences the story being told.
In “Cameraperson,” Johnson gives us behind-the-scenes glimpses into what it means to tell people’s stories through imagery.
The conversations are intimate and the implications are thought-provoking. The footage addresses storytelling, trust, political repression, surveillance, censorship, freedom, presence, and much more.
Deliberate, Scene by Scene
Twenty-five years of footage is a lot to work with, but “Cameraperson” found a solid story in the editing process.
Johnson partnered with editor Nels Bangerter, who won acclaim for his work on the 2013 documentary “Let the Fire Burn” (composed exclusively of found footage). The result is an incredibly deliberate narrative.
“You hear my voice in the first couple of shots, you see my hand,” she said. “We say ‘she’s here, she’s here, she’s here’ in the first few shots. And then we let that go, and you know I’m there because you’ve acquired that tool.”
The film invites the viewer to think about the impact the cameraperson has on the scene being shot, on the story being told, before navigating through a journey of interactions with people from all walks of life, in all sorts of places. Meanwhile, the viewer is aware that he or she is now viewing Johnson viewing the world.
Johnson is hyperaware that the story told in the final cut of any documentary is just one of many storylines that unfold at one time. The drivers, the translators, the sound crew—everyone involved with the making of a documentary is involved with the creation of the story being told, and everyone is aware of the effect of their presence, she said.
“There are always other storylines going on when you’re making a documentary, and no one really sees that,” she said. She might want to follow an interesting-looking person walking down the street but can’t, or itch to capture something happening behind her, and her areas of interest have shifted over time through the different stages of her life.
“Clearly, I have all these ideas with the work that I struggle with and think about, and we searched for a way to … answer the questions,” she said. “Many of the questions are in the footage itself.”
Questions of Humanity
The dilemma Johnson faces is most present when the needs of the people she witnesses are “so acute and so visceral,” she said.
Johnson, who has accumulated more anecdotes and examples of ethical dilemmas than could ever fit into a single film, recounted an instance in Rwanda. While filming, she heard a woman screaming. She turned around to see that, across the valley, a pregnant woman was being lifted onto a stretcher. She turned to the director and asked, “Will [the team] help her, or film her?”
It’s not always such a clear dichotomy.
“She said, ‘We’re going to film them and then we’re going to help them,’” Johnson said. She trusted the director. “It was our job to show the ways in which there was no infrastructure in the country, and this was a perfect example of that.”
There was no time to ask for permission to film. The crew drove their car past the people helping the woman, up onto the hill they were ascending. Then Johnson came out of the car with the camera to capture the scene.
“The people are looking at me, as they’re carrying the woman up the hill, like, ‘What kind of human being are you? How can you be doing this to us?’, and that, I could see in their eyes,” she said.
Immediately after, the crew helped the woman into the car and drove her to the hospital, where she had her baby and named it after the driver.
“But that does not take back those two minutes we drove past them,” Johnson said. “I looked into their eyes, they looked into my eyes—that’s damage done. … That’s the kind of thing I struggle with with camerawork all the time.”
We have all seen images of impoverished children in Haiti, who did not have the power to say no to being filmed, Johnson added as another example. How much impact is that having?
“In principle you’re doing it for a larger good, but what are you doing in the moment of actually shooting it?” she asked. The person holding the camera, intrinsically, has more power than the person being filmed, she said. But she remembers many cases where those being filmed take power for themselves “in really thrilling ways.”
Power and Platform
Over the course of her career, what she has allowed herself to film or decided she could not film has changed, sometimes even from shot to shot. Things flip quickly in their meaning. The ethical limits are a moving target. There are shots she has done but refused to do again because she felt they betrayed her humanity and the humanity of the people she filmed. There are also situations that are the opposite.
She remembers filming in a jail, escorted by a police officer whom she’d asked to gain the permission of those jailed before she started filming. The police officer did not ask, and instead led Johnson through the jail, using her and the camera as a show of his authority.
The people in the jail began to make a fuss, voicing their objections. The film crew had wanted to gain access to the police department, and this was an uncomfortable situation to be in. Johnson felt like she was completely “trampling on people’s rights and feelings.”
“I think that in my younger years, I probably would have turned off my camera in the moment when everyone was questioning me and saying, ‘You can’t do this to us,’” she said. But, realizing there were more complex dynamics in place, she didn’t, and told the people she wouldn’t film their faces as she went through.
Suddenly, a man spoke up, asking her, “Hey, do you know why I’m jailed?”
“He said he had a misdemeanor, was poor, and couldn’t pay this fine,” she said. “He suddenly realized the camera could give him a voice. … That shift happened because I didn’t turn the camera off.
“The camera gives you power—that does not mean you are the only powerful one in the equation.”
Actions have consequences. But where the responsibility falls is not clear.
If being on the scene inherently impacts the outcome of the story, Johnson has played a part in many things in history and the future that she cannot even begin to fathom.
In one film, for which her crew followed a public defender in Washington, Johnson spent a lot of time with a group of youths in the criminal justice system, and even taught one of them how to drive. She listed a few things she felt were outcomes of the documentary: a viewer ended up giving a huge donation to the school featured; the documentary ended up being the only footage the mother of one of the teens had of him after he died; one of the teens was later arrested for hijacking a taxi at gunpoint.
“There’s no balance scale in the world that can say where that ends up,” Johnson said.
Many of the documentaries Johnson works on are in locations or related to issues where political oppression is at play. An interviewee may consent to being filmed and be imprisoned for it two years later. There are cases where “if you say something on camera, it can mean your life,” Johnson said.
Yet it is not all her responsibility as a cameraperson, nor is it the director’s, nor of the people being filmed.
“None will know what will become of what we shoot in the future … we can’t know, it’s impossible to know,” she said. “Part of what I want to acknowledge in ‘Cameraperson’ is that we can’t know. It is impossible to be responsible to another human being when you film an image of them.”
This is an increasingly pressing issue in the world today, when images are being transmitted at a rate that far outpaces any other time in history. People are used to having their images captured, and sometimes that changes contexts and conversations. Technology has enabled us “instantaneous access to all of us,” she said.
“The ideas of what does it mean to be a human and imagery, this is a very huge dilemma for all of us,” Johnson said.
Not that the film, nor Johnson, is a downer. “I want people to walk away full of love for the world, and also full of questions about what images mean to all of us,” she said.
Center of the World
Johnson has always been drawn to questions of social justice and why it does or doesn’t happen, and has committed herself to recording human rights issues. She is currently working on multiple projects simultaneously and exploring questions related to how we react to violence in imagery.
Her journey toward becoming a cameraperson began with her examining the idea of racism, which led her to a film by Ousmane Sembène. “I kind of had my mind blown by his different way of showing the world,” she said. Sembène, who has been called “the father of African film,” made films touching on issues like the history of colonialism, religion, and African societies.
After graduating from Brown University with a degree in fine arts and literature, she traveled to Senegal to study with Sembène and acclaimed filmmaker Djibril Diop Mambéty, and then from there to the La Fémis film school in France. She’d been advised that if she applied for a spot in directing, as an American, it was a lost cause. She was accepted to study cinematography, picked up a camera, and fell in love.
“A camera gives you entree into worlds that you’re not supposed to be in,” she said. It also “gives you the chance to get really close to people.”
Access is one of her biggest considerations when it comes to weighing whether she will work on a documentary, as filmmaking is all about constraints. Because even if the director is inexperienced or the crew is limited, just having a camera there gives the capacity to film evidence, document history.
One of her longstanding collaborations is with Oscar-winning filmmaker Laura Poitras, who directed “The Oath” and “Citizenfour,” and one of the reasons is Poitras’s amazing ability to gain access.
“One of her ways of working is finding the people who are at the center of what is a profound social dilemma,” Johnson said.
In “The Oath,” Poitras somehow was able to find the people “who were at the very center of things” in the post-9/11 world, Johnson recounted. She tracked down Osama bin Laden’s bodyguard and his driver. “And for me to sit in that trial in Guantanamo Bay and witness that, that was a profound experience of being in history.
“That is a very exhilarating experience and can be very terrifying,” Johnson said. “It’s very scary to be that close to history as it’s happening. It’s very real stakes and it feels like a huge responsibility.”
In snippets of slivers of stories,”Cameraperson” gives the viewer a glimpse into various lives. A Nigerian midwife, a boxer in Brooklyn, women in postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina, characters telling traumatic stories and hopeful stories.
It also includes intimate, highly personal original footage of Johnson’s mother, a scene that was an important revelation for Johnson. She had filmed a conversation with her mother while her mother could not remember who Johnson was.
“Sharing that felt really important to me,” Johnson said.
“Probably the most significant part was me overcoming my own fears about self-revelation, and showing my failings and my mistakes and my questions.”
At one point they had considered using voice-over, but Johnson realized everything she said was too much and yet there was no way to say enough. It was overwhelming—for her—and felt oppressive, unwatchable. They realized it was not the language of the film.
“I’ve been speaking the language of camerawork for 25 years,” she said. “That is the language in which I am articulate.”